Monday, December 12, 2011

How To Piss Off People You Don't Even Know

A funny thing happened on the way to the DMV...


Actually, it happened at the DMV, but you get it.


After receiving my "next to be called" number, I took a seat amongst the others. Soon, the door swung open and a frail lady with a walker came into the room. I looked around and noticed that all the seats were full. I also noted that no one was getting up to offer their seat to this older woman. So, I rose and offered her mine. I was, frankly, a little surprised. Why was I the only person to do so? Admittedly, I half-glared at the men in the room and wondered to myself what the world was coming to. 


A few days later, this video was posted on reddit:


Clearly, Keanu is a gentleman (not a "douche", as the video asks). And clearly, this is my opinion. 


I decided to respond to the reddit post with my DMV story, and in no less than 12 hours, I received replies to this effect:

  • You asked for equality and so you don't get to complain.
  • You're a spoiled bitch.
  • Fuck you, you little princess.
  • You're a sexist bitch. Why did you glare at the men only? 
  • Your logic is flawed. Chivalry is dead because of bitches like you.
  • You've probably never done a decent day's work. 
  • You're exactly why I refuse to open a door for a woman.
In addition, someone on reddit found my OKCupid profile and then joined to send me this sweet nothing:
Just wanted to see if you were as repulsive in your profile as you come off in your comments elsewhere. And you are - I would touch you with a ten foot pole.
Awww...think we're a match?

Now, I love reddit. I just posted a great story about reddit's outpouring of help to a little boy. Initially, I tried to defend myself but...what's the saying? "Insanity is doing something over and over again expecting different results." (Rita Mae Brown, I think.)


But the attacks kept coming. And I stopped trying to argue the point. Seriously, I received at least 60 comments telling me that I was a whiny princess bitch. Ha ha! I stopped reading them, but not before it was pointed out to me that my post-reply had been cross-posted to a men's rights forum. Oh, woe is man.


I admit, it made my blood boil. But not because I was attacked verbally (really, that doesn't bother me--these people don't know me personally). 


I was pissed because it seemed to be such a consensus that chivalry is indeed dead.


And then I was sad. 


And I am still sad.


If my grandmother were still alive, is this the treatment she would receive? Is my mother--my dear, sweet, wouldn't-hurt-a-fly mother!--being treated this way? I'm sorry if you are, Mom. 


I am not a feminist. That does not mean that I don't think women should be treated equally. I hold doors open for everyone. I treat men the way I feel I should be treated--the way I feel women should be treated. 


I believe that if a woman is doing a job that is historically reserved for a man, she should be paid the same wage. I do not think that women should be paid less because they're women (not womyn). I feel that men can cook and clean just as well as women, and should be expected to do their share of things around the house. I certainly don't think that wives should stay home, raise babies, and clean and cook while their husbands are working. Because I feel that way does not make me a feminist.


But really, this isn't entirely a gender issue for me. This is about treating people with respect and courtesy. Why does equality seem to mean discourtesy toward women? 


People should open doors for one another.
People should offer their seats to older people, especially when they're visibly disabled.
People should treat one another with courtesy.


"Ah, but Beth" you argue, "you glared at the men."


So, I did. But that's because I feel that men should be the most likely candidates for behaving this way. Sexist? If that's what it is, then maybe I am biased toward the genders. Maybe it's because I'm a Southerner. 


And maybe it's archaic, but I'm sorry we're losing that little tradition. But I found the Art of Manliness site and this is what they had to say on the subject: 
 A Word on Door-Opening and Other Acts of Old Fashioned Chivalry
Before we get to the ins and outs of door opening, let us take a moment to discuss its place in modern society, because not everyone feels its a tradition worth preserving. There are some women who are offended by it because they think it implies the inferior status of women–that women are too weak to open doors for themselves. Kate thinks that if you’re dating a woman who takes umbrage at having the door opened for her, that’s a red flag, because it signals that she does not understand that a woman can be smart and independent while still being playful about gender roles. I can’t really speak to that, so I’ll let the ladies duke it out. Then there are men who think you shouldn’t do things like open doors for women because if women want to be fully independent and equal these days, then they need to give up being treated with any special consideration. To me this is an entirely wrong-headed approach to relationships, because it’s premised on the idea that everything must be tit for tat. Yes, you open doors for a woman, but your woman probably does special things for you. If she doesn’t, then that’s the problem, not chivalry itself. It’s madness to think that equality must mean doing the exact same things for each other and constantly keeping score.
Now, that's more about personal relationships, but it still rings true. 

I feel like I could branch off in about three or four different discussions right now, so I'll stop. But...

I'll just leave this here. 



See you soon,
~Beth









Friday, December 09, 2011

How To Piss Off People You Thought You Knew Better

Well, there's the case of Rick Perry. You should know by now that he released a YouTube video called "Strong" the other day. It's a real mess:

I posted it on my Facebook wall, with this text, which I wrote while my blood pressure was rising:

Are you kidding me? What does serving in the military have to do with making the whole country observe a Christian holiday? There's nothing wrong with Christmas or Christians. But your sexuality has nothing to do with loving your country enough to protect it. If this jerk gets elected, we're in for a heap of trouble. And to those of you who love him, I'm sorry if you're offended by my opinion, but I'm offended by this man. Ignorant fool. 

Yeah, I know. I didn't write as clearly as I'd liked. Now, I have a good mix of liberal and conservative friends; Democrat and Republican. And naturally, there were some arguments in the comments, but most people agreed that Rick Perry is scary. 

Then I decided to post a Second City video, that was made in response to Perry's video:

Well, that didn't go over well. Only one of my friends commented that she was even more disgusted by this video than by Perry's, though another friend told me on the phone that it pained her to watch that video. (And before your panties get bunched entirely, let's note that Second City is a 50-years-running comedy troupe from Chicago.) 

And I'll just leave this here, too. (Spoiler: Homophobia is related to homosexual arousal.)

So, let's discuss this. Me first.

Let's point out three facts:
  • This country is not 99.9% Christian. This country, while there are no official scientific measures, is comprised of approximately 78.4% Christian, 4.7% Other Religions (Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, etc.), 16.1% Unaffiliated, and .8% Unknown (to make the numbers all roundy and stuff). Source
  • Gays have been in the military since the military began. "According to a Jan. 26 study by the Williams Institute at UCLA's School of Law, there are an estimated 66,000 lesbians, gays and bisexuals currently serving in the U.S. armed forces." (Read more about the history of gays in the military here.) That is about 5%. 
  • Prayer is NOT forbidden in public schools. The Constitution forbids public schools from directing or favoring prayer. The Free Exercise Clause expressly protects "opinion, expression of opinion, and practice" of religion. Michael McConnell, Religion and the Constitution (2002), p. 105 

As a Jew, I can attest that I've felt underrepresented by my government and my society since I could first notice. I've heard people mention Christianity as if it's a stamp of approval or proof that someone is a good person for as long as I can remember. I've seen those little fish in business ads as if to say, "Hey, we won't take advantage of you because we believe in Jesus Christ." Blecch! So, if you're Jewish or Buddhist or Agnostic...you're not to be trusted? I mean, why are people so intent on equating Christians to Good People? The crimes out there are being committed by whom? According to NELP, 1 in 4 Americans have criminal records. Those can't possibly be Christians! /sarcasm

And while I'm decidedly heterosexual, I'm thankful for the 5% of gays and lesbians who have chosen to protect a country that hates their guts. As a proud veteran of the U.S. Navy, thank you

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal [no PC-bullshit here], that they are endowed by their Creator [doesn't say "God" necessarily, but I'd accept the argument] with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty [to choose religion, sexuality, etc.], and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed [99% of the people giving permission to the 1% to speak for us]

This may not mean much to you as a Human Being, but as an American, it should mean everything.

Have we just forgotten? 

I'll  leave you with this surprising quote:
"...I will be your President regardless of your faith, and I don't expect you to agree with me necessarily on religion. As a matter of fact, no President should ever try to impose religion on our society. A great--the great tradition of America is one where people can worship the way they want to worship. And if they choose not to worship, they're just as patriotic as your neighbor..."
~The Smartest Thing George W. Bush Ever Said

See you soon,
~Beth





Friday, December 02, 2011

Good Men Doing Something

If you haven't heard already, a wonderful thing happened recently over at Reddit. Before I link you to the actual story, let me give you some background about Reddit and why I have enjoyed the site for years. 

Founded in 2006, Reddit is a social news site, comprised of communities where members post/link newsworthy (germane to the community) information. The community then upvotes or downvotes the post. If the link receives enough upvotes, it goes "front page" making it a very popular story. Reddit actually began/inspired Steven Colbert's Rally to Restore Truthiness. Some historic post examples would be:

Two days ago, a redditor asked the Assistance community for help. You see, he's dating a lady whose nephew, Lucas, has a rare (read "one in a million") blood disorder. The family lives in Florida but treatments will be given at Duke University, and the temporary move and the treatments were bound to bankrupt the family. You can read more about it here


(That's Lucas in the picture, wearing his Reddit shirt!)

So, within twelve hours, redditors had donated more than $30,000 to help the family defray the costs of relocating and treatments! More on this here

This, Folks, is why I am a Humanist. With all of the shitty, shitty things going on in this world, there are still people who have hope for humanity. There are still people who actively contribute to restoring hope in humanity. 

I'm so thankful for redditors. 

Oh, and please don't forget that there are other kids out there who need help. You might be able to pitch in. Consider registering at Be The Match

See you soon,
~Beth

Friday, November 25, 2011

Black Friday Blues

I saw a disturbing photo today. I'm sure it's quite accurate. So, what makes it disturbing? Well, in spite of the quiet uprising that is happening all over the country, people are still choosing to spend their money at Wal Mart. This...is disturbing.

My friend, Jen, explained the Wal Mart phenomenon a few days ago. She was telling another one of our friends why one should not give their money to Wal Mart. (Forgive me, Jen, for paraphrasing. I will not be quite so eloquent.)

Think of Wal Mart as a microcosm...a world unto itself. 
Wal Mart makes life so easy, doesn't it? I mean, it is truly one-stop shopping! YAY!
You can get your banking done, grab a bite to eat at McDonald's or Subway, have your nails done at the salon, grocery shop, purchase electronics or home goods. If you need an oil change, they've got that. Yup! 

So, you have your average Wal Mart employee. Two-thirds are either senior citizens, college students, or second income providers. I'd also argue that they are minorities. Employees have to cover 33% of their insurance costs, according to that same site (the story is from 2004 so my apologies), higher than most corporations. In addition, Wal Mart actually encourages their employees to file for social welfare benefits, because, you know--they don't actually pay a living wage. Want some more astoundingly-sad data? Read this.

Now, when you make a shitty wage, what do you have to do? You have to spend wisely so what's the first place you think of when you think "low-budget"? Wal Mart, of course! So after taxes, SSI, and insurance, you take your 48% of your income and give 24% of it right back to Wal Mart. Isn't that convenient? 

You're left with 24% of your income to take care of yourself and/or your family. 

Is that so bad? Since Wal Mart rarely employs anyone full-time (hey!), what it means is, you have $273 a month to take care of business. 

[By the way, I don't endorse anything I link to; I'm merely supporting my findings.]

THAT SUCKS. 

I would argue, too, that if you walk through a Wal Mart, it's downright depressing. Women with too many mouths to feed, meandering down the frozen foods aisle to provide their families with way too many preservatives. 

Ever heard of meat glue? Thrombin coagulants are regularly used at Wal Mart. It's a neat-o way of taking scrap beef (all FDA-approved, so no worries!) and mixing it with transglutaminase to create a solid piece of meat, which is then sold as "top dollar cuts at bottom dollar prices"! What a fantastic idea, right? 

Sure, if you're a miser. But see, they don't have to include transglutaminase in their ingredients list. Have you ever tried to cook a Wal Mart steak? I have. Many months ago, before I made the conscious decision to stop giving them my money, I found a ribeye at Wal Mart that was a steal! I brought it home and gave it the treatment. What this means is, on a hot grill, no more than 4 minutes per side. But...it didn't look cooked. I mean, it still had this really blood-red appearance that made me check the internal temperature. Yup, about 135 degrees, F. So, I pulled it from the grill and plated it. I cut into it and well...it cut weird. It was as if the grain was gone. Then I tasted it. And it was horrible. It tasted like salt. And no matter how long I masticated that meat, it never broke down the way a steak is supposed to break down!

I suspected meat glue immediately, and I was right. Look, I can't prove it directly but I'm a Texan and we know beef. And frankly, I don't want glue in my meat. 

The whole point is, when will we stop deceiving ourselves by giving our money to companies that aim to deceive us? 

Wal Mart: Low Prices. Live Better?

I fear I could go on too long about this. Let's wrap this up now before it gets out of hand. I  leave you with a snippet of lyrics from the Dave Matthews Band's Too Much:

I told God, I'm coming 
To your country 
I'm going to eat up your cities, 
Your homes, you know. 
I've got a stomach full. It's not 
A chip on my shoulder. 
I've got this growl in my tummy 
And I'm gonna stop it today. 

I eat too much.
I drink too much. 
I want too much. 
Too much. 

See you soon,
~Beth

Monday, November 21, 2011

Why Giving Up and Failing Are the Same Thing

So, yesterday, I went to the Po'Boy Festival in New Orleans, LA. It was fantastic. I ate a pate and pickled vegetables po'boy (needed salt and pepper) and one of the most delicious garlic shrimp po'boys I'd ever crammed into my mouth. It was sunny and the mood was decidedly upbeat. I was with friends that I love and we got to discussing why I stayed in my previous relationship. And I said just what I said in my first post: I'd rather fail than give up. 

But I got to thinking as I said it that it's really the same thing. My friends helped me realize this. I mean, don't you fail when you give up? Do you give up when you fail? Of course, at some point, I must've said "I give up on trying to make this work". 

What I really meant all along is that I am not one who gives up easily. I am tenacious about relationships. I believe they are hard work. I feel you must put effort into them. And when someone fucks up, you have to forgive (there is a line, of course, but everyone deserves a second chance for the most part). I am also a romantic when it comes to love. I believe in the great love story. I want the love story to have a happy ending. So, I will try and try (and sometimes, I'm the only one doing so) because I feel when you quit someone, you'd better be damned sure that's what you really want. When I leave, I'm not coming back. You get the idea.

It usually has to get pretty bad before I stop caring. 

I stayed because I cared. When I stopped caring, I ended it. Now to tie that up in a neat little package with a quote...

See you soon,
~Beth


Sunday, November 20, 2011

Where Are We Going, and Why am I in This Handbasket?

Liberals. Conservatives. Republicans. Democrats. Po-tay-toes. Po-tah-toes.

Labels. Even Blogger offers them. 

For many years, I called myself a liberal. For a little over a decade, I labeled myself an agnostic. I said I was a Democrat. In fact, I've done a lot of thinking about labels and the roles we play throughout our lives. 

For instance, I kept seeing my life playing out in roles:
Baby, child, teenager, young adult, wife, mother, grandmother, dead.
And I kept thinking about the amount of time spent in each role. You know, we spend a good three to four years as a baby, about ten more as a child, another seven as teenagers, young adulthood sticks around for a bit, and then...

Well, we all just seem to be in such a hurry after that. Why is that? "Wife, mother, grandmother" can actually happen within a span of 15 years or so! What's the rush?

But really, I'm digressing. Let's get back to the labels.

Religion:
At some point, I let the agnostic bit go. It was overused in my circles. I found Humanism (another label!) which seemed a lot less "prove it to me" than agnosticism. Humanism was more laissez-faire. As humans, we have to accept the fallibility of man. I could not deny my Jewish ancestors, though, and now define myself as a Humanist Jew. My culpability is limited. I am free from finding fault or blame with the universe. Rather than attributing goodness (or badness) to God (any god), I place the blame squarely on the shoulders of human beings. It belongs there. 

Politics:
For so long, I was politically-charged. I loved to debate politics and express my point of view. I adored getting my parents riled up about liberalism and conservatism (they're both decidedly conservative). But then, I got tired of being brushed off. Once you declare your "liberal" or "Democrat" label aloud, a good percentage of the population stops listening to you. To that percentage, you're not just wrong, you're a whack-job. And it's not a lie to say that I'm a conservative liberal. I like the juxtaposition, Number One, and Number Two, I am quite conservative on many subjects. How does a liberal say that they want to limit the power of our government without saying they're conservative? Wouldn't that be a conservative government? 

Potatoes:
Okay, I'm only kidding.

But, what is it with these labels? Why do we seek to be labeled? Is it, indeed, to define ourselves? Is it necessary in order to communicate with one another? Do we do it so that we can get everyone on the same page with regard to understanding each other? If you ascribe to Maslow's hierarchy of needs, then yes, that's it. He was right. 
Mazlow's Hierarchy of Needs
That's old-school, Folks!


And there's nothing wrong with it. 


When you find yourself communicating with someone for the first time, it seems a lot less about who you are than what you are. 


I've really tried to get away from labels. But people need them from you. They need to define you; they need you to define yourself. We love neat little packages tied up with string. We are all little boxes that we present to one another. If you're looking for a job, dating, parenting, making new friends, burying a loved one...


You're making boxes. 





See you soon,
~Beth

Saturday, November 19, 2011

Good Men Doing Nothing

Edmund Burke wrote, "When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle." Many years later, this has been paraphrased as "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing". I rather like the misquote. It's straight and to the point. This is exactly what I hope you'll find in this blog.

Let's be frank. Blogging has been around for well over a decade, and blogs are prolific. Does the world need another viewpoint? Better yet, could there be a finite number of viewpoints? After all, They say there are only seven original plots (we know better, but that's what They say). For years, politics has been about two sides. "The Truth" only has three. So, are there a finite number of viewpoints?

Maybe so.

But here's mine anyway.




Let me introduce myself. I am known as Beth, but my given name is Elizabeth Lubel. Sure, google me if you think it's necessary. There's some stuff out there. I turned 40 this year. I live outside of New Orleans right now, southeast of it. I miss it a lot. I'm a former teacher, a current private chef, and a future...yeah, that's good. I'm a future. I'm divorced with zero children, and I quite like it that way. There are enough children to look after in this world right now. I can barely keep up with them. I'm decidedly single. Almost two months ago, I broke up with a someone who has not quite learned how to treat people. Or animals. I've struggled to find the reason why I spent over three years with this man. I think that struggle has led me to a conclusion:
I would rather fail than give up.


The culmination of the aforementioned synopsis has led me to create this blog. It's my third one. By finding this blog, you can count on a couple of things from me. 
  1. Statements of strong opinions, using strong language 
  2. Entries about food and dining
  3. Stories that need to be told
  4. Ideas about our world
What you won't find in this blog:
  1. Man-bashing
  2. Pro-Feminism or Man-bashing as a result of pro-feminism
  3. One-sided politics (unless it just has to be said)
  4. Spelling errors
So, should you choose to revisit this page, please know that I aim to entertain, but as always, I am me. I am a future. 


See you soon,
~Beth